Specials and Promotions
New call-to-action
Specials and Promotions
New call-to-action
Specials and Promotions
New call-to-action
Specials and Promotions
New call-to-action
A Guide to Understanding Project Reviews

When Would You Do a 1-Hour Review vs a 6-Month Review?

When it comes to conducting a review—timeframes are indicative. They will vary depending on project size, complexity, and organisational context. Here are some scenarios where each type of review may be appropriate:

1-Hour Review

A 1-hour review, also known as a quick or ad-hoc review, is typically conducted for smaller projects or to address specific issues or concerns that arise during the project, make rapid decisions, and keep the project on track. These reviews are usually less formal and involve fewer relevant stakeholders.

For instance:

Addressing immediate project issues: If a project encounters unexpected challenges or obstacles, a quick review can be conducted to assess the situation, identify potential solutions, and make prompt decisions.

Checking project progress: When a project is ongoing, a 1-hour review can be scheduled to gauge its overall status quickly, ensure it is on track, and address any minor issues or risks that have surfaced.
Providing immediate feedback: A brief review session can be conducted when quick feedback is needed, such as reviewing a draft document or seeking input on a specific aspect of the project.

6-Month Review

Conversely, a 6-month review, also known as a semi-annual review, is typically more comprehensive. It involves a broader range of stakeholders and focuses on the project's long-term performance and improvement or the organisation's project management practices.

For instance:

Evaluating project performance: A 6-month review allows for a thorough assessment of the project's progress, performance, and outcomes over a significant period. It provides an opportunity to analyse key metrics, evaluate the achievement of milestones, and assess the project's overall success.

Identifying long-term trends and patterns: By conducting a review at this interval, organisations can identify patterns and trends in project performance, resource allocation, and risk management. This helps make informed decisions for future projects and improve overall project management practices.

Capturing lessons learned: A 6-month review allows for collecting and analysing valuable lessons learned throughout the project. It provides an opportunity to document best practices, identify areas for improvement, and disseminate knowledge across the organisation.

Adjusting strategies and plans: Based on the findings of a 6-month review, organisations can make strategic adjustments to project plans, resource allocation, or risk mitigation strategies. It allows course correction and ensures projects align with the organisation's goals.

Next Up

What Is the Difference Between a Project Audit and a Project Review?

Featured Resources

View All Resources